The editorial development of the Encyclopedia of the Cold War, currently
being produced by MTM
Publishing for the academic and reference publisher
Routledge, is underway. The encyclopedia aims to be the first reference
work on the Cold War to take advantage of advances in Cold War studies
following the fall of the Soviet Union and the opening up of various national
archives.
The growing list of international scholars that have signed
on as contributors to this exciting new project includes: Piero Gleijeses,
Jussi Hanhimaki, Hope Harrison, John Earl Haynes, William Hitchcock, Harvey
Klehr, Mark Kramer, Edwin Moise, Ron Pruessen, Thomas Schwartz, Balazs
Szalontai and Ted Wilson.
Editorial
Structure
Its
editorial development is lead by a team of cutting-edge scholars in this
newly-transformed field. They are:
Ruud
van Dijk, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Will
Gray, Purdue University
Svetlana
Savranskaya, National Security Archive
Jeremi
Suri, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Qiang
Zhai, Auburn University Montgomery
To be published in three volumes and organized alphabetically,
the encyclopedia will analyze the Cold War from a range of perspectives which,
taken together, form a full and comprehensive study of the international
environment that shaped—and was shaped by—the Cold War. The material, in
roughly 500 individual articles, includes events, individuals, movements, and
concepts relating to political, military, and diplomatic history; economic,
social, and cultural phenomena; and artistic and intellectual trends. The third
volume will be rounded out with a set of appendices including a comprehensive
chronology of the period and an extensive group of primary documents. The
document appendix will be compiled with the help of Christian Ostermann,
Director of the Cold War International History Project (CWIHP) at the Woodrow
Wilson International Center for Scholars.
The
Encyclopedia’s New Cold War Studies Methodology
Traditional approaches to the study of Cold War history emphasize United
States–Soviet relations, political and diplomatic affairs, and the arms race;
and scholars working before 1990 relied heavily—out of necessity—on Western
archives (especially in the United States). However, the so-called "new" Cold
War history, while not ignoring earlier approaches, has vastly increased the
archival, geographical, and analytical scope of what now is also called "Cold
War studies."
While most scholars
continue to see the Cold War as lasting, with periods of varying intensity,
from roughly 1945 until 1991, the complete or partial opening of new archives
(first and foremost in formerly communist countries or their successor states)
has led to an internationalization of the field. Traditional scholarship (most
prominently the study of United States foreign relations) has continued to
produce valuable work, but most of the pathbreaking work in the study
of Cold War history has been done by an increasingly international
community of scholars using archival collections, oral history, and other
sources all over the world and writing genuinely international histories.
Indeed, one of the prominent ways in which Cold War history has changed since
1990 is in the increased attention it now pays to the roles of actors other
than those in leadership positions in major capitals, such as Washington and
Moscow, including participants in social and other movements in East, West, and
the developing world.
Widening the archival and geographical scope of Cold War studies also has
led to analytical innovation and disciplinary expansion. These changes have not
replaced the earlier framework of Cold War history, as its contours are
still quite visible in new Cold War scholarship. Rather, these changes have
widened and deepened our understanding of how the East–West conflict, which
started at the end of World War II over the future of the postwar world, shaped
the postwar era (and continues to shape our own times). They also have added to
our understanding of the complexity of the interactions among a multitude of
actors.
This new encyclopedia is designed to reflect this new Cold War history. By
drawing from the international community of Cold War scholars for its editorial
board and authors, and by including a significant section of primary documents
reflecting, among other things, a representative choice of the most important
archival findings from newly opened Cold War era archives around the world, the
encyclopedia aims to be the new reference work of choice on Cold War studies
for practicing historians and academics as well as high school and college
students.
In developing the encyclopedia along these lines, the
articles—arranged in A to Z order in the final printed work—will consider and
analyze events, trends, and individuals in the following chronological
categories. Our aim in establishing the era-by-era categories as the basis for
the first stage of developmental work is to encourage the creation of fully
textured international “stories” of these topics, aiming to avoid fracturing
the analysis into perspectives focused on individual disciplines—diplomatic
affairs, political history, military history, etc. We have also included a
general category to cover topics that range across time periods as well as
disciplines.
Categories
of Coverage
Era
I: 1945-1953
The Truman–Stalin years, including the Cold War's
"pre-history." These are the formative years, when the conflict not only takes
shape (in Europe), but also spreads and heats up (in Asia), begins to engender
an arms race, and starts to influence participants' domestic affairs.
Era II: 1954-1964
The so-called “crisis
years,” coinciding with Khrushchev's years in power, during which Khrushchev is
a focus in much of what happens, either as initiator or as responder. Key
events are: Hungary/Poland and Suez, 1956; the Berlin Crisis, 1958-1963; the
Sino-Soviet rift; the Cuban Missile Crisis; growing upheaval in the developing
world (Cuba, Vietnam, Laos). At the same time, this era sees smaller nations
and groups assert their own roles: European integration; East European
challenges to Soviet rule; independence movements in the developing world,
the rise of the non-aligned movement.
Era III: 1965-1979
The rise and fall of
detente. This era is shaped by the stabilization between the main powers (the
"North"), in spite of the events in Czechoslovakia and escalating turmoil in
the developing world, especially Vietnam, but also in China (the Cultural
Revolution), Africa, and the Middle East. Efforts to control, maybe even
overcome, the East–West rivalry between the great powers (through arms control
initiatives), as well as efforts by various European countries and activists
(Ostpolitik, students, the push for what becomes "Helsinki") come into play.
Also covered here will be turmoil on the "periphery" (Afghanistan, Central
America), and domestic challenges to the governments of major Cold War powers.
Era IV: 1980-1991
Renewed East–West tension,
including a new phase in the arms race. This coincides with overextension
(i.e., Afghanistan) of an increasingly fragile (Poland, for example) Soviet
empire, while communist China begins to liberalize its economy. By the middle
of the decade the Soviet side begins, first, to withdraw and, next, to
disintegrate (Eastern Europe): what started as a conflict based on two
competing visions for the postwar world sees the main representative of one
negotiate a surrender.
General: Ideas, Culture,
Institutions, and Entities
While specific events and individuals have shaped the contours
of the Cold War, ideas and culture have played a significant role as well. Most
of the articles to be covered under this rubric, therefore, relate to general
intellectual, political, and cultural trends, many of which have been a source
of reenergized analysis taking place under the umbrella of the new “Cold War
studies” emerging in the last few years. This category, therefore —given its
overarching thematic thrust—encompasses entries that don’t fit into individual
eras. It also includes entries on some countries and institutions that reach
across the chronological scope of the Cold War.